Job evaluation aims to provide this equity and consistency by defining the relative worth of different jobs in an organization. Job evaluation is the process of determining the relative worth of different categories of jobs by analyzing their responsibilities and consequently, fixation on their remuneration.
Job evaluation is a system of determining the relative worth of different jobs in an organization. Here a particular job of an enterprise is compared with its other jobs. Comparative study of these jobs is very necessary because on the basis of such study the structure of wages for different types of jobs is prepared. The value of each job depends on certain factors.
In other words, Job evaluation is the process of establishing the value of jobs in a job hierarchy. Job evaluation is a formal and systematic comparison of jobs in order to determine the worth of one job relative to another so that a wage or salary hierarchy results.
It is a process by which jobs in an organization are appraised. Job evaluation begins with job analysis and ends up with the classification of jobs according to their worth. The purpose of job evaluation is to determine the basic wage rates for different jobs.
These are some definitions of job evaluation given by the authors:
[su_quote cite=”Kimball and Kimball”]Job evaluation represents an effort to determine the relative value of every job in a plant and to determine what the fair basic wages for such a job should be.[/su_quote]
[su_quote cite=”Edwin B. Flippo”]Job Evaluation is a systematic and orderly process of determining the worth of a job in relation to other jobs’. He further said that the objective of this process is to determine the correct rate of pay. It is therefore not the same as job analysis. Rather it should follow the job analysis process, which provides the basic data to be evaluated.[/su_quote]
[su_quote cite=”Wendell French”]Job evaluation is a process of determining the relative worth of various jobs within the organization, so that different wages may be paid to jobs of different worth”. The relative worth of a job means the relative value produced. The variables which are considered for value produced are responsibility, skill, effort and working conditions, etc.[/su_quote]
[su_quote cite=”Dale Yoder”]Job evaluation is a practice which seeks to provide a degree of objectivity in measuring the organizational value of jobs within the organization and among similar organizations.[/su_quote]
We can define job evaluation as a process of analyzing and describing positions, grouping them, and determining their relative value by comparing the duties of different positions in terms of their different responsibilities and other requirements.
The process of job evaluation involves the following steps:
Before undertaking job evaluation, top management must explain the aim and use of the program to the employees and unions. To elaborate the program further, oral presentations could be made. Letters and booklets could be used to classify all relevant aspects of the job evaluation program.
It is not possible for a single person to evaluate all the key jobs in an organization. Usually, a job evaluation committee consisting of experienced employees, union representatives, and HR experts is created to set the ball rolling.
Every job need not be evaluated. This may be too taxing and costly. Certainly, key jobs in each department may be identified. While picking up the jobs, care must be taken to ensure that they represent the type of work performed in that department.
This requires the preparation of a job description and also an analysis of job needs for successful performance.
The most important method of evaluating the jobs must be identified now, keeping the job factors as well as organizational demands in mind.
The relative worth of various jobs in an organization may be found out after arranging jobs in order of importance using criteria such as skill requirements, experience needed, under which conditions the job is performed, type of responsibilities to be shouldered, degree of supervision needed, the amount of stress caused by the job, etc.
Weights can be assigned to each such factor. When we finally add all the weight, the worth of a job is determined. The points may then be converted into monetary values.
On the evaluation process is over and a plan of action is ready, management must explain it to employees and put it into operation.
In the light of changes in environmental conditions (technology, products, services, etc.) jobs need to be examined closely. For example, the traditional clerical functions have undergone a rapid change in sectors like banking, insurance, and railways, after computerization.
New job descriptions need to be written and the skill needs of new jobs need to be duly incorporated into the evaluation process. Otherwise, employees may feel that all relevant job factors based on which their pay has been determined have not been evaluated properly.
Perhaps the simplest method of job evaluation is the ranking method. According to this method, jobs are arranged from highest to lowest, in order of their value or merit to the organization. Jobs can also be arranged according to the relative difficulty in performing them.
The jobs are examined as a whole rather than on the basis of important factors in the job; the job at the top of the list has the highest value and obviously, the job at the bottom of the list will have the lowest value. Jobs are usually ranked in each department and then the department rankings are combined to develop an organizational ranking.
The variation in payment of salaries depends on the variation of the nature of the job performed by the employees. The ranking method is simple to understand and practice and it is best suited for a small organization.
Its simplicity however works to its disadvantage in big organizations because rankings are difficult to develop in a large, complex organization. Moreover, this kind of ranking is highly subjective in nature and may offend many employees.
Then, for each job grade so created standard job descriptions are determined. Thereafter, such standard description is matched with job descriptions in the organization. The standard description that most nearly matches the job description determines the job‘s grading.
This method requires a decision at the initial stage on the number of pay grades to be included in the wage and salary plan. Of course, the actual amount to be assigned to pay grades is made after the job evaluation is completed.
Under this method, instead of ranking complete jobs, each job is ranked according to a series of factors. These factors include mental effort, physical effort, the skill needed, responsibility, supervisory responsibility, working conditions, and other such factors (for instance, know-how, problem-solving abilities, accountability, etc.).
Pay will be assigned in this method by comparing the weights of the factors required for each job, i.e. the present wages paid for key jobs may be divided among the factors weighted by importance (the most important factor, for instance, mental effort, receiving the highest weight). In other words, wages are assigned to the job in comparison to its ranking on each job factor.
The point method is widely used currently. Here, jobs are expressed in terms of key factors. Points are assigned to each factor prioritizing each factor in order of importance. The points are summed up to determine the wage rate for the job. Jobs with similar point totals are placed in similar pay grades. The procedure involved may be explained thus:
The purpose of job evaluation is to produce a defensive ranking of jobs on which a rational and acceptable pay structure can be built. The important features of job evaluation may be summarized thus:
Job evaluation is the process of determining the value of a particular job within an organization. There are several advantages to conducting a job evaluation, including:
Job evaluations can help ensure that employees are paid fairly for their work, based on the duties and responsibilities of their positions.
Job evaluations can provide a basis for determining which employees are eligible for promotions or transfers to other positions within the organization.
Conducting a job evaluation can help improve communication between management and employees, as it allows employees to understand the expectations and responsibilities of their positions.
Job evaluations can help identify any training or development needs that employees may have in order to perform their jobs effectively.
Fair pay and clear job expectations can improve employee morale and reduce turnover.
Job evaluations can help organizations plan for the future by identifying key positions and the employees who are best suited to fill them.
Job evaluations can help organizations ensure that they are in compliance with various laws and regulations, such as those related to equal pay and non-discrimination.
There are several potential disadvantages to using job evaluation as a method for determining pay and compensation in an organization. These are some disadvantages of job evaluation:
Job evaluation is the process of establishing the value of jobs in a job hierarchy. Job evaluation is a formal and systematic comparison of jobs in order to determine the worth of one job relative to another so that a wage or salary hierarchy results.
Job evaluation is a system of determining the relative worth of different jobs in an organization. Here a particular job of an enterprise is compared with its other jobs. Comparative study of these jobs is very necessary because on the basis of such study the structure of wages for different types of jobs is prepared. The value of each job depends on certain factors.
Following are the Steps process of job evaluation:
1. Gaining Acceptance
2. Creating Job Evaluation Committee
3. Finding the Jobs to be Evaluated
4. Analyzing and Preparing Job Description
5. Selecting Method of Evaluation
6. Classifying Jobs
7. Installing the Program
8. Reviewing Periodically.
These are three basic methods of job evaluation in HRM:
1. Ranking Method
2. Job Classification Method
3. Factor Comparison Method
4. Point Method.