The Norwegian government has chosen to retain a treatment criterion in the Mental Health Care Act despite the opposition of several user organizations. From a critical user perspective, the only reason for using coercion to require mental health treatment is that the individuals are in a state where they are an immediate danger to themselves and/or their surroundings. This articles aims, first, to provide an overview of research studies concerning the benefits or harmfulness of involuntary treatment after coerced admission and, second, to evaluate studies that try to compare involuntary with voluntary treatment. A systematic overview of studies of compulsory mental health care with regard to treatment criteria, coercion in mental health, and involuntary admission published over the last decade was examined in detail, along with a secondary manual search of references cited in identified publications. Few studies have been conducted on the effect of compulsory mental health care, and the results have been contradictory. More randomized studies are needed to document the kinds of effects that the use of compulsory treatment has on treatment results. Another issue that needs further examination is whether the use of coercion should be transferred to legal bodies with an adjudicatory process.
Keywords: Coercion in mental health care; Compulsory treatment research; Mental health law; Treatment criterion.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Tørrissen T. Tørrissen T. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2007 Aug 23;127(16):2086-9. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2007. PMID: 17717572 Norwegian.
Joa I, Hustoft K, Anda LG, Brønnick K, Nielssen O, Johannessen JO, Langeveld JH. Joa I, et al. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2017 Nov-Dec;55:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Oct 12. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2017. PMID: 29157507
Diseth RR, Bøgwald KP, Høglend PA. Diseth RR, et al. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2011 Jan-Feb;34(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.11.001. Epub 2010 Dec 8. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2011. PMID: 21144587
Sheehan KA. Sheehan KA. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2009 Nov;22(6):582-6. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e328330cd15. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2009. PMID: 19654545 Review.
Aagaard J, Tuszewski B, Kølbæk P. Aagaard J, et al. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2017 Dec;31(6):641-646. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2017.07.008. Epub 2017 Aug 10. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2017. PMID: 29179833 Review.
Løvsletten M, Lossius Husum T, Haug E, Granerud A. Løvsletten M, et al. SAGE Open Med. 2020 May 27;8:2050312120926410. doi: 10.1177/2050312120926410. eCollection 2020. SAGE Open Med. 2020. PMID: 32537158 Free PMC article.
Rabenschlag F, Cassidy C, Steinauer R. Rabenschlag F, et al. Front Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 24;10:231. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00231. eCollection 2019. Front Psychiatry. 2019. PMID: 31105598 Free PMC article.
Oliva F, Ostacoli L, Versino E, Portigliatti Pomeri A, Furlan PM, Carletto S, Picci RL. Oliva F, et al. Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 8;9:740. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00740. eCollection 2018. Front Psychiatry. 2019. PMID: 30670991 Free PMC article.
Feiring E, Ugstad KN. Feiring E, et al. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct 25;14:500. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0500-x. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014. PMID: 25344295 Free PMC article.